PLANS Lawsuit

November 11, 2007UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT – MEMORANDUM
“The district court erred in excluding the testimony of the witnesses in question. Because PLANS intended to call the witnesses as percipient witnesses, it did not need to comply with the court’s deadline for expert witness disclosure. Moreover, the record indicates that PLANS disclosed the witnesses as early as January 2001. Even if the witnesses had not been properly disclosed, there was no prejudice as the School Districts had previously designated the same witnesses as expert witnesses. …Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.”
November 3, 2005254 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
September 28, 2005248 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 52(c)
September 12, 2005241.1 Transcript of Trial
April 20, 2005229 THIRD AMENDED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
March 25, 2005227 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MICHELLE L. CANNON IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE
March 25, 2005225 DEFENDANTS’ JOINT REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. THIRTEEN (13) TO EXCLUDE EXPERTS NOT PROPERLY DISCLOSED BY PLAINTIFF
March 25, 2005224 DEFENDANT’S JOINT REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. TWELVE (12) TO EXCLUDE EXHIBITS NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED OR PRODUCED
March 25, 2005223 DEFENDANTS’ JOINT REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ELEVEN (11) TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY WITNESSES NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED
March 18, 2005221 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE NO. THIRTEEN (13) TO EXCLUDE “EXPERTS”
March 18, 2005220 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE NO. TWELVE (12) TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS
March 18, 2005219 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ELEVEN (11) TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES
March 16, 2005218 AMENDED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
March 14, 2005217 OBJECTIONS BY DEFENDANT SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO PORTIONS OF THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER FILED FEBRUARY 18, 2005
March 14, 2005216 DEFENDANT TWIN RIDGES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT’S OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
March 11, 2005211 DECLARATION OF MICHELLE L. CANNON IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE
March 11, 2005210 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. THIRTEEN: DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERTS NOT PROPERLY DISCLOSED BY PLAINTIFF
March 11, 2005209 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. TWELVE: DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXHIBITS NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED OR PRODUCED
March 11, 2005208 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ELEVEN: DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY WITNESSES NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED
March 11, 2005207 DEFENDANTS’ JOINT NOTICE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE
February 18, 2005206 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
February 11, 2005204 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN PREPARATION FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
February 11, 2005203 JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT
January 28, 2005202 NOTICE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AFFECTED BY PLAINTIFF’S MOST RECENT WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS
January 14, 2005196 DEFENDANTS’ FINAL PRETRIAL STATEMENT
January 14, 2005198 JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT
July 15, 2004187 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE ANTHROPOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS
June 25, 2004161 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
June 25, 2004162 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
May 28, 2004163 DECLARATION OF JONATHAN P. HUBER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION.
February 10, 2003109 OPINION from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the standing of PLANS and reinstating PLANS’ federal lawsuit
May 23, 2001100 Full text of PLANS’ lawsuit dismissal by The Honorable Frank C. Damrell May 23, 2001
October 24, 199949 Memorandum and Order: Decision of Judge Damrell 10/24/99 rejecting the school districts’ request for summary judgment in PLANS’ Establishment Clause lawsuit
February 10, 19981 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: PLANS, Inc., Plaintiffs v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TWIN RIDGES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DOES 1 – 100, Defendants