| November 11, 2007 | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT – MEMORANDUM
“The district court erred in excluding the testimony of the witnesses in question. Because PLANS intended to call the witnesses as percipient witnesses, it did not need to comply with the court’s deadline for expert witness disclosure. Moreover, the record indicates that PLANS disclosed the witnesses as early as January 2001. Even if the witnesses had not been properly disclosed, there was no prejudice as the School Districts had previously designated the same witnesses as expert witnesses. …Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.” |
| November 3, 2005 | 254 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
|
| September 28, 2005 | 248 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 52(c) |
| September 12, 2005 | 241.1 Transcript of Trial |
| April 20, 2005 | 229 THIRD AMENDED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER |
| March 25, 2005 | 227 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MICHELLE L. CANNON IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE |
| March 25, 2005 | 225 DEFENDANTS’ JOINT REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. THIRTEEN (13) TO EXCLUDE EXPERTS NOT PROPERLY DISCLOSED BY PLAINTIFF |
| March 25, 2005 | 224 DEFENDANT’S JOINT REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. TWELVE (12) TO EXCLUDE EXHIBITS NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED OR PRODUCED
|
| March 25, 2005 | 223 DEFENDANTS’ JOINT REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ELEVEN (11) TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY WITNESSES NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED |
| March 18, 2005 | 221 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE NO. THIRTEEN (13) TO EXCLUDE “EXPERTS” |
| March 18, 2005 | 220 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE NO. TWELVE (12) TO EXCLUDE DOCUMENTS |
| March 18, 2005 | 219 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ELEVEN (11) TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES |
| March 16, 2005 | 218 AMENDED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER |
| March 14, 2005 | 217 OBJECTIONS BY DEFENDANT SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO PORTIONS OF THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER FILED FEBRUARY 18, 2005 |
| March 14, 2005 | 216 DEFENDANT TWIN RIDGES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT’S OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER |
| March 11, 2005 | 211 DECLARATION OF MICHELLE L. CANNON IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE |
| March 11, 2005 | 210 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. THIRTEEN: DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERTS NOT PROPERLY DISCLOSED BY PLAINTIFF |
| March 11, 2005 | 209 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. TWELVE: DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXHIBITS NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED OR PRODUCED |
| March 11, 2005 | 208 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. ELEVEN: DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY WITNESSES NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED |
| March 11, 2005 | 207 DEFENDANTS’ JOINT NOTICE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE
|
| February 18, 2005 | 206 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER |
| February 11, 2005 | 204 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN PREPARATION FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE |
| February 11, 2005 | 203 JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT |
| January 28, 2005 | 202 NOTICE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AFFECTED BY PLAINTIFF’S MOST RECENT WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS |
| January 14, 2005 | 196 DEFENDANTS’ FINAL PRETRIAL STATEMENT |
| January 14, 2005 | 198 JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT |
| July 15, 2004 | 187 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE ANTHROPOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS |
| June 25, 2004 | 161 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION |
| June 25, 2004 | 162 PLAINTIFF’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION |
| May 28, 2004 | 163 DECLARATION OF JONATHAN P. HUBER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION. |
| February 10, 2003 | 109 OPINION from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the standing of PLANS and reinstating PLANS’ federal lawsuit |
| May 23, 2001 | 100 Full text of PLANS’ lawsuit dismissal by The Honorable Frank C. Damrell May 23, 2001 |
| October 24, 1999 | 49 Memorandum and Order: Decision of Judge Damrell 10/24/99 rejecting the school districts’ request for summary judgment in PLANS’ Establishment Clause lawsuit |
| February 10, 1998 | 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: PLANS, Inc., Plaintiffs v. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, TWIN RIDGES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DOES 1 – 100, Defendants |
